Robert Buist

Overview

Birth Date: November 14, 1805

Death Date: July 13, 1880

Birth Location: Cupar Fyfe, Scotland

Role: Nurseryman, Seedsman

Used Keywords: Alley, Border, Dutch style, Edging, Fence, Fountain, French style, Greenhouse, Hothouse, Nursery, Parterre, Pond, Rockwork/Rockery, Shrubbery, Statue, Thicket, Trellis, View/Vista, Walk

Other resources: Library of Congress Authority File; Getty ULAN;

Export as RDF

Robert Buist (November 14, 1805–July 13, 1880) was a Scottish-born nursery- and seedsman based in Philadelphia. Through his businesses and his garden manuals, Buist became one of the most influential figures in American horticulture during the 19th century.

History

Fig. 1, “Robert Buist,” Gardener’s Monthly and Horticulturist 22, no. 264, ed. Thomas Meehan (December 1880): pl. opp. 372.

Robert Buist was born in Cupar Fyfe, Scotland, on November 14, 1805 [Fig. 1]. Though little is known about his early life, he is believed to have trained as a gardener with William McNab, who served from 1810 until 1848 as the Principal Gardener of the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh. McNab was known for his careful relocation of the Edinburgh garden to its present site at Inverleith, with much of the transfer of plants occurring between 1821 and 1823, possibly during Buist’s tenure there. Buist later moved to Derbyshire to work in the gardens of General Charles Stanhope, the 3rd Earl of Harrington, at Elvaston Castle, before immigrating to the United States in August 1828. On arriving in Philadelphia, Buist quickly immersed himself in its horticultural community, working briefly at David Landreth’s nursery in Moyamensing before becoming the gardener of Henry Pratt’s Lemon Hill [Fig. 2]. In June 1829 he participated in the first exhibition of the Pennsylvania Horticultural Society, with which he maintained a lifelong affiliation.

Fig. 2: J. Albright (illustrator), J. B. Longacre (engraver), Lemon Hill, in The Floral Magazine and Botanical Repository (1832).

By September 1830 Buist had left his post at Lemon Hill to go into business with the nurseryman Thomas Hibbert, whose greenhouses were located on 13th Street between Lombard and Cedar (now South) Streets. As part owner, Buist had a degree of autonomy that he likely lacked in his earlier positions—he described his situation at Landreth’s, where he was relegated to hoeing weeds, as especially dismal. Within his first year of joining Hibbert, the pair considerably expanded the nursery by purchasing Bernard M’Mahon’s former botanic garden, Upsal, and Buist travelled back to Scotland and England “to make arrangements . . . to receive continued supplies of all kinds of new and desirable Plants and Flowers.” While abroad, Buist also paid a visit to J. C. (John Claudius) Loudon—the preeminent horticulturist in England—and returned to Philadelphia in November 1831 with his longtime friend, the architect John Notman. Buist’s travels yielded some fine stock, particularly of dahlias, which was described in the May 15, 1832, issue of the National Gazette and Literary Register as “upwards of fifty of the most distinct [dahlias] in color and the largest in size; some of them Glob[e]-flowered, and Anemone-flowered, which are considered beautiful and rare.”

The partnership of Hibbert & Buist was successful but not long-lived; Thomas Hibbert died on May 11, 1833, just a year after the National Gazette’s report. Hibbert’s widow determined to carry on her husband’s business while Buist struck out on his own, using part of the Hibbert & Buist stock to open his own independent nursery on 12th Street [Fig. 3] and a seed warehouse on Chestnut Street. “R. Buist’s Exotic Nursery” featured a greenhouse 150 feet in length, 18 feet wide, and 15 feet high, that was divided into five compartments to accommodate the different plants he stocked. The front compartment was referred to as the “New-Holland House” and featured various plants from Australia, including species of Banksia—which Buist likely learned to cultivate while working with McNab, who specialized in the plant—and was followed by the hothouse, which featured the canary bird flower (Tropaeolum peregrinum), petunias, ficuses, and other rare plants. Toward the rear Buist created compartments dedicated to specific types of flower, including the Geranium House, the Camellia House, and the Rose House.

Fig. 3: Oscar Alexander Lawson, Rob[er]t Buist, Nurseryman & Florist (calling card), n.d.

Fig. 4: A. Hoffy, “View of Robert Buist’s City Nursery and Greenhouses,” 1846.

Buist’s nursery and seed warehouse were enormously successful during the 1830s and 1840s, allowing him to expand his business. By 1837 he had built a separate camellia house and small stove at South 12th Street [Fig. 4], and by 1849 he had established a nursery for fruit and ornamental trees southwest of Philadelphia, called Rosedale, where he eventually consolidated all but his seed business in 1850. During these decades Buist remained an active member of the Pennsylvania Horticultural Society, gaining recognition for helping found the American Pomological Society, as well as for his introduction of verbenas and various types of roses to North America, and for the introduction of the poinsettia to Europe. He is often—if mistakenly—given credit for introducing the poinsettia to the United States as well; however, as Joel T. Fry has observed, it was first cultivated at the Bartram Botanic Garden and Nursery in 1828. Buist also authored three frequently reprinted gardening manuals—the American Flower Garden Directory (1832), the Rose Manual (1844), and the Family Kitchen Gardener (1847)—which helped make him one of the most recognizable figures in American horticulture.

Even in the midst of these professional accomplishments, Buist suffered various familial challenges in the 1840s. His wife, Jane Menzies Buist—the mother of his sons, John and Robert Jr.—died from tuberculosis on July 12, 1840, and Buist remarried shortly after to Ellen Chambers (née Stephens), with whom he had one daughter. During this period he also lodged two lawsuits against his brother William, who had established a nursery in Washington, DC, and who may have tried to bolster his business by trading on Robert’s success. Though the court cases remain obscure, the results are not: in September 1847 Alexander Hunter, the marshal of Washington, DC, seized William’s nursery “to satisfy judicials . . . in favor of Robert Buist against said Wm. Buist.” Bankrupt and out of business, William died in July 1850. Robert’s home and business, by contrast, was full to brimming at this time: according to the 1850 federal census, taken in July that year, Buist was supporting not only his new wife, stepdaughter, daughter, and son Robert Jr., but also members of his wife’s extended family and about 20 servants, laborers, and gardeners, all from Scotland and Ireland.

The number of gardeners and laborers Buist brought over from Britain and Ireland greatly enhanced botanical knowledge in the United States. His service to American horticulture was described as twofold—Colonel Marshall P. Wilder of the Massachusetts Horticultural Society noted that “he not only introduced rare plants, but rare men.” Buist remained active in the plant trade throughout the 1850s, 60s, and 70s, and the value of his businesses increased considerably: the 1850 census notes the “value of property owned” as $35,000, and the 1860 census indicates a personal worth estimated at $45,000, exclusive of the impressive $125,000 Buist owned in real estate. It may have been his financial success that allowed Buist to relinquish control of the seed warehouse to his younger son, Robert Jr., by September 1861, and to direct his attention largely to floriculture. Robert Buist fully retired from the nursery business in 1876 and died four years later, at the age of 74.

—Elizabeth Athens

---

Texts

• Buist, Robert, 1841, The American Flower Garden Directory, 2nd ed. (1841: 9)

“The French partially adopt the. . . [Italian] system, interspersing it with parterres and figures of statuary work of every character and description. When such is well designed and neatly executed, it has a lively and interesting effect; but now the refined taste says these vagaries are too fantastic, and entirely out of place.”

• Buist, Robert, 1841, The American Flower Garden Directory, 2nd ed. (1841: 9–10)

“A late writer says of Dutch gardening, that it ‘is rectangular formality’: they take great pride in trimming their trees of yew, holly, and other evergreens, into every variety of form, such as mops, moons, halberds, chairs &c. In such a system it is indispensable to order that the compartments correspond in formality, nothing being more offensive to the eye than incongruous mixtures of character.”

• Buist, Robert, 1841, The American Flower Garden Directory, 2nd ed. (1841: 10–11)

“. . . if access to a spring can be obtained, it will prove a desideratum in completing the whole: it can be available for a fish-pond or an acquariam [sic], or can be converted into a swamp for the cultivation of many of our most beautiful and interesting native plants.”

• Buist, Robert, 1841, The American Flower Garden Directory, 2nd ed. (1841: 11)

“For perspicuity, admit that the area to be enclosed [for a flower garden] should be from one to three acres, a circumambient walk should be traced at some distance within the fence, buy which the whole is enclosed; the inferior walks should partly circumscribe and intersect the general surface in an easy serpentine and sweeping manner, and at such distances as would allow an agreeable view of the flowers when walking for exercise. Walks may be in breadth from three to twenty feet, although from four to ten feet is generally adopted. . . covered with gravel, and then firmly rolled with a heavy roller. . .”

• Buist, Robert, 1841, The American Flower Garden Directory, 2nd ed. (1841: 11–12)

“But, in commencing these operations, a design [for the flower garden] should be kept in view that will tend to expand, improve, and beautify the situation; not, as we too frequently see it, the parterre and borders with narrow walks up to the very household entrance: such is decidedly bad taste, unless compelled for want of room. . . . The outer margin of the [flower] garden should be planted with the largest trees and shrubs: the interior arrangement may be in detached groups of shrubbery and parterres.”

• Buist, Robert, 1841, The American Flower Garden Directory, 2nd ed. (1841: 12)

“In some secluded spot rock-work or a fountain, or both, may be erected; the foundation of the former should consist of mounds of earth, which will answer the purpose of more solid erections, and will make the stones go farther: rocks of the same kind and colour should be placed together, and the greatest possible variety of character, size and form, should be studied, the whole showing an evident and well defined connexion. These erections generally are stiff artificial disjointed masses, and often decorated with plants having no affinity to their arid location.”

• Buist, Robert, 1841, The American Flower Garden Directory, 2nd ed. (1841: 13)

“All the large divisions [of a flower garden] should be intersected by small alleys, or paths, about one and a half or two feet wide.”

• Buist, Robert, 1841, The American Flower Garden Directory, 2nd ed. (1841: 13)

“When there is not a green-house attached to the flower garden, there should be at least a few sashes of framing or a forcing pit to bring forward early annuals, &c., for early blooming. These should be situate [sic] in some spot detached from the garden by a fence of Roses, trained to trellises, Chinese Arbour Vitae, Privet, or even Maclura makes excellent fences. . .”

• Buist, Robert, 1841, The American Flower Garden Directory, 2nd ed. (1841: 20)

“Thick masses of shrubbery, called thickets, are sometimes wanted. In these there should be plenty of evergreens. A mass of deciduous shrubs has no imposing effect during winter.”

• Buist, Robert, 1841, The American Flower Garden Directory, 2nd ed. (1841: 31)

“BOX EDGINGS.

“May be planted any time this month [March], or beginning of next, which in most seasons will be preferable. We will give a few simple directions how to accomplish the work. In the first place, dig over the ground deeply where the edging is intended to be planted, breaking the soil fine, and keeping it to a proper height, namely, about one inch higher than the side of the walk; but the taste of the operator will best decide, according to the situation.”

• Buist, Robert, 1841, The American Flower Garden Directory, 2nd ed. (1841: 32)

Grass verges for walks and borders, although frequently used, are, by no means, desirable, except where variety is required; they are the most laborious to keep in order, and at best are inelegant, and the only object in their favor is, there being everywhere accessible.

• Buist, Robert, 1841, The American Flower Garden Directory, 2nd ed. (1841: 145, 148)

“ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF A HOT-HOUSE. . .

“Site and Aspect.—The house should stand on a situation naturally dry, and, if possible, sheltered from the north-west, and clear from all shade on the south, east, and west, so that the sun may at all times act effectually upon the house. The standard principle, as to aspect, is to set the front directly to the south. Any deviation from that point should incline to the east.

“Dimensions.—The length may be from ten feet upward; if beyond forty feet, the number of fires and flues are multiplied. The medium width is from twelve to sixteen feet. . .

“Bark Pit.—We consider such an erection in the centre of a hot-house a nuisance, and prefer a stage, which may be constructed according to taste. It should be made of the best Carolina pine, leaving a passage all round, to cause free circulation of air.”

---

Images

• 

  Oscar Alexander Lawson, Rob[er]t Buist, Nurseryman & Florist, n.d.

• 

  Oscar Alexander Lawson, Rob[er]t Buist, Nurseryman & Florist (calling card), n.d.

• 

  J. Albright (illustrator), J. B. Longacre (engraver), Lemon Hill, in The Floral Magazine and Botanical Repository (1832).

• 

  A. Hoffy, “View of Robert Buist’s City Nursery and Greenhouses,” 1846.

• 

  “Robert Buist,” Gardener’s Monthly and Horticulturist 22, no. 264, ed. Thomas Meehan (December 1880): pl. opp. 372.

---

---