A Project of the Center for Advanced Study in the Visual Arts, National Gallery of Art
History of Early American Landscape Design

Difference between revisions of "Clump"

[http://www.nga.gov/content/ngaweb/research/casva/research-projects.html A Project of the National Gallery of Art, Center for Advanced Study in the Visual Arts ]
Line 3: Line 3:
 
The clump emerged as a garden feature in the eighteenth century in both England and America. The earliest treatises available in North America defined a clump as a group of seven or eight trees planted to form a single unit [Fig. 1]. The Complete Farmer (1769) stipulated that this grouping of trees was “without shape or order,” and Samuel Johnson (1755) referred to a clump as “a shapeless piece of wood.” Johnson, however, added that the feature was “nearly equal in its dimensions,” suggesting thatit was round in plan. Geographer Jedidiah Morse’s 1789 description of the “circular clumps” at Mount Vernon indicates that some Americans interpreted rounded, symmetrical groupings of trees as clumps.  
 
The clump emerged as a garden feature in the eighteenth century in both England and America. The earliest treatises available in North America defined a clump as a group of seven or eight trees planted to form a single unit [Fig. 1]. The Complete Farmer (1769) stipulated that this grouping of trees was “without shape or order,” and Samuel Johnson (1755) referred to a clump as “a shapeless piece of wood.” Johnson, however, added that the feature was “nearly equal in its dimensions,” suggesting thatit was round in plan. Geographer Jedidiah Morse’s 1789 description of the “circular clumps” at Mount Vernon indicates that some Americans interpreted rounded, symmetrical groupings of trees as clumps.  
  
English author Thomas Whately in 1770 provided an extensive discussion of clumps that was often cited by later treatise writers . He charac te r i z ed a clump as a smaller ve rsion of a “close wood” or an “open grove. ” U n l i ke his prede c e s sors, Whately insisted  
+
English author Thomas Whately in 1770 provided an extensive discussion of clumps that was often cited by later treatise writers . He characterized a clump as a smaller version of a “close wood” or an “open grove. ” Unlike his predecessors, Whately insisted that a clump could be made of two trees and that the most agreeable form of it “extended rather in length than in breadth,” thus contradicting Johnson’s stipulation that a clump was “nearly equal in its dimensions . ” Whately’s argument that clumps should be irregular in form derived from contemporary debates in landscape gardening that cautioned against the artificial appearance of overly regularized forms. Inshort, irregularity suggested the desired quality of naturalness (see Landscape gardenin g and Modern style). To adhere to the new aesthetic of naturalness, clumps had to display both a variety of vegetation and forms according to the scenery in which they were placed.  
t hat a clump could be made of two trees and  
 
t hat the most agreea ble form of it “exte n ded
 
r at her in length than in breadth,” thus cont
 
r a d icting Jo h n son’s st i p ul ation that a clump  
 
was “nearlyequ al in its dime n s i o n s . ”  
 
W hately’s argume nt that clumps should be  
 
ir r e g ular in form de r i ved from conte m p o r a r y
 
de bates in landsc ape ga rdening that caut
 
i o n ed agai n st the artific i al ap p earance of  
 
overly regul a r i z ed forms. In short, ir r e g ul a rity
 
sug g e sted the de s ir ed qu ality of nat u r alness
 
(see La n d s c ape garde n i n g and Mo de r n
 
st y l e). To adhere to the new aest het ic of natu
 
r alness, clumps had to display both a va r i et y
 
of ve g et ation and forms ac c o rding to the  
 
scenery in which they were plac ed.  
 
  
The composition of clumps varied  
+
The composition of clumps varied according to American treatise writers and observers. Bernard M’Mahon in 1806 was inclusive when he stated that clumps could be composed solely of trees or shrubs, or a mixture of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants. Ten years later, G. Gregory in his New and Complete Dictionary of Arts and Sciences (1816) suggested that clumps “of shrubs all of the same kind” created “good” effects. Clumps from a mixture of larger and smaller deciduous trees, such as the horse chestnut and red bud, were created at Monticello, as described by Thomas Jefferson (1807).
according to American treatise writers and  
 
observers. Bernard M’Mahon in 1806 was  
 
inclusive when he stated that clumps could  
 
be composed solely of trees or shrubs, or a  
 
mixture of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous  
 
plants. Ten years later, G. Gregory in his New  
 
and Complete Dictionary of Arts and Sciences  
 
(1816) suggested that clumps “of shrubs all  
 
of the same kind” created “good” effects.  
 
Clumps from a mixture of larger and smaller  
 
deciduous trees, such as the horse chestnut  
 
and red bud, were created at Monticello, as  
 
described by Thomas Jefferson (1807).
 
  
T he arrangeme nt of plant mate r i alwithin
+
The arrangement of plant material within clumps was equally varied. An article in the 1833 volume of the New England Farmer recommended that “a proper system” be adopted in order to avoid “a heterogeneous mass, without meaning, without taste or design.” By contrast, American gardeners John Gardiner and David Hepburn, in the Am erican Gardener ( 1 8 04), recommended the use of a graduated slope for such plantings. Regarding the placement of this feature in the landscape, Whately distinguished between two modes. “Independent clumps,” considered “beautiful objects in themselves” could be used to “break an extent of lawn” or as a “continued line . . . of ground or of plantation.” “Relative clumps,” however, planted in relation to other garden features, could be used to create harmonies and contrasts, thus unifying the disparate parts of landscape garden into a single composition. Whately’s disparagement of artifice led him to regard independent clumps with suspicion because of their obvious artificiality. The best treatment of an independent clump, according to Whately, was the placement of “open” clumps (meaning that the plant material was well spaced) “at the point of an abrupt hill, or on a promontory into a lake or river,” where it served to focus the viewer’s attention. “Relative clumps” were more natural, according to Whately’s aesthetic, and a sensitive placement of them intensified the viewer’s visual experience of the garden by providing a succession of open and occluded views.
clumps was equ ally va r i ed. An article in the  
 
1833 vol u me of the New England Fa r m e r r e c
 
  
 +
Thomas Jefferson, when writing in 1804 of his plan to create “advantageous catches of prospect” through the careful planting of clumps, was clearly familiar with Whately’s guidelines for “relative clumps.” This idea was especially apparent when Jefferson specified that he intended to break up his “canvas” of grove—“trimmed very high, so as to give it the appearance of open ground”—with “clumps of thicket, as the open grounds of the English are broken by clumps” of trees. Even in the 1830s when other garden styles, such as the gardenesque, were current, garden designers still envisioned clumps as a means to control access to a view, as in C. M. Hovey’s 1835 description in American Gardeners’ Magazine of Mansion House in Brookline, Mass. (see Gardenesque).
  
o m me n ded that “a proper system” be
+
Several late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century American gardens exemplify the use of clumps according to Whately’s categories. Benjamin Henry Latrobe’s 1807 plan for the White House made use of planting features that corresponded to relative clumps, positioned to create a transition from the wood and garden [Fig. 2]. The notion that clumps could “relieve” the plainness of lawns or woods was found in C. M. Hovey’s description in the Magazine of Horticulture of Mrs. Pratt’s house in Boston (1850), which noted how clumps “broke” the monotony of the landscape. At Mount Auburn Cemetery in Cambridge, Mass., H.A.S. Dearborn (1831) praised how the clumps of trees and shrubs helped to diversify the “picturesque sheets of water.
a d o pted in order to avoid “a hete ro g e n eo u s
 
mass, without meaning, without taste or
 
design.” By cont r a st, Ame r ican ga rde n e r s
 
John Ga rdiner andDavid Hepburn, in the
 
A m e r ican Gard e n e r ( 1 8 04), recomme n ded the  
 
use of a graduated slope for such plantings.  
 
Regarding the placement of this feature
 
in the landscape, Whately distinguished
 
between two modes. “Independent clumps,”
 
considered “beautiful objects in themselves”
 
could be used to “break an extent of lawn”
 
or as a “continued line . . . of ground or of  
 
plantation.” “Relative clumps,” however,
 
planted in relation to other garden features,  
 
could be used to create harmonies and contrasts,
 
thus unifying the disparate parts of  
 
landscape garden into a single composition.  
 
Whately’s disparagement of artifice led him
 
to regard independent clumps with suspicion
 
because of their obvious artificiality.  
 
The best treatment of an independent
 
clump, according to Whately, was the placement
 
of “open” clumps (meaning that the
 
plant material was well spaced) “at the point
 
of an abrupt hill, or on a promontory into a
 
lake or river,” where it served to focus the viewer’s attention. “Relative clumps” were
 
more natural, according to Whately’s aesthetic,
 
and a sensitive placement of them
 
intensified the viewer’s visual experience of  
 
the garden by providing a succession of open
 
and occluded views.  
 
  
Thomas Jefferson, when writing in 1804
+
The aesthetic concerns of Whately and his contemporaries were complemented by the material advantages that clumps offered. As Charles Marshall wrote in 1799, clumps of four or five fenced-in forest trees provided an excellent resource for timber. Americans who cleared away trees for their homesteads presumably perceived the advantage of leaving standing clumps of trees for later use as construction or heating materials, as indicated in P. Campbell’s 1793 description of the Catskill Mountains.  
of his plan to create “advantageous catches
 
of prospect” through the careful planting
 
of clumps, was clearly familiar with
 
Whately’s guidelines for “relative clumps.
 
This idea was especially apparent when
 
Jefferson specified that he intended to break
 
up his “canvas” of grove—“trimmed very
 
high, so as to give it the appearance of open
 
ground”—with “clumps of thicket, as the
 
open grounds of the English are broken by
 
clumps” of trees. Even in the 1830s when
 
other garden styles, such as the gardenesque,
 
were current, garden designers
 
still envisioned clumps as a means to control
 
access to a view, as in C. M. Hovey’s 1835
 
description in American Gardeners’ Magazine
 
of Mansion House in Brookline, Mass. (see
 
Gardenesque).  
 
  
Several late eighteenth- and early
+
Several treatise writers, however, condemned clumps. British designer Humphry Repton, while acknowledging that groups of trees were important elements in landscape design, argued that “formal” clumps of trees of equal height surrounded by a fence for their protection were ugly deformities because of their sameness. In one of his earliest writings (1836), American designer A. J. Downing declared the clump to be perfect. By the time he wrote his treatise (1849), he confessed that experience had taught him that the clump was the product of an amateur ornamental planting. He judged trees of the same height that were planted equidistant from one another in a circular form as overly artificial [Fig. 3]. Like Repton, Downing instead recommended arranging trees in irregular patterns in order to achieve “variety, connexion, and intricacy.
nineteenth-century American gardens
 
exemplify the use of clumps according to  
 
Whately’s categories. Benjamin Henry
 
Latrobe’s 1807 plan for the White House
 
  
made use of planting features that corresponded
+
-- ''Anne L. Helmreich''
to relative clumps, positioned to
 
create a transition from the wood and garden
 
[Fig. 2]. The notion that clumps could
 
“relieve” the plainness of lawns or woods
 
was found in C. M. Hovey’s description in the
 
Magazine of Horticulture of Mrs. Pratt’s house
 
in Boston (1850), which noted how clumps
 
“broke” the monotony of the landscape. At
 
Mount Auburn Cemetery in Cambridge,
 
Mass., H.A.S. Dearborn (1831) praised how
 
the clumps of trees and shrubs helped to
 
diversify the “picturesque sheets of water.”
 
 
 
The aesthetic concerns of Whately and
 
his contemporaries were complemented by
 
the material advantages that clumps
 
offered. As Charles Marshall wrote in 1799,
 
clumps of four or five fenced-in forest trees
 
provided an excellent resource for timber.
 
Americans who cleared away trees for their
 
homesteads presumably perceived the
 
advantage of leaving standing clumps of
 
trees for later use as construction or heating
 
materials, as indicated in P. Campbell’s 1793
 
description of the Catskill Mountains.
 
 
 
Several treatise writers, however, condemned
 
clumps. British designer Humphry
 
Repton, while acknowledging that groups of
 
trees were important elements in landscape
 
design, argued that “formal” clumps of trees
 
of equal height surrounded by a fence for
 
their protection were ugly deformities
 
because of their sameness. In one of his earliest
 
writings (1836), American designer A. J.
 
Downing declared the clump to be perfect.
 
By the time he wrote his treatise (1849), he
 
confessed that experience had taught him
 
that the clump was the product of an amateur
 
ornamental planting. He judged trees of
 
the same height that were planted equidistant
 
from one another in a circular form as
 
overly artificial [Fig. 3]. Like Repton, Downing
 
instead recommended arranging trees in
 
irregular patterns in order to achieve “variety,
 
connexion, and intricacy.
 
 
 
ALH
 
  
 
==Texts==
 
==Texts==

Revision as of 19:53, January 13, 2016

History

The clump emerged as a garden feature in the eighteenth century in both England and America. The earliest treatises available in North America defined a clump as a group of seven or eight trees planted to form a single unit [Fig. 1]. The Complete Farmer (1769) stipulated that this grouping of trees was “without shape or order,” and Samuel Johnson (1755) referred to a clump as “a shapeless piece of wood.” Johnson, however, added that the feature was “nearly equal in its dimensions,” suggesting thatit was round in plan. Geographer Jedidiah Morse’s 1789 description of the “circular clumps” at Mount Vernon indicates that some Americans interpreted rounded, symmetrical groupings of trees as clumps.

English author Thomas Whately in 1770 provided an extensive discussion of clumps that was often cited by later treatise writers . He characterized a clump as a smaller version of a “close wood” or an “open grove. ” Unlike his predecessors, Whately insisted that a clump could be made of two trees and that the most agreeable form of it “extended rather in length than in breadth,” thus contradicting Johnson’s stipulation that a clump was “nearly equal in its dimensions . ” Whately’s argument that clumps should be irregular in form derived from contemporary debates in landscape gardening that cautioned against the artificial appearance of overly regularized forms. Inshort, irregularity suggested the desired quality of naturalness (see Landscape gardenin g and Modern style). To adhere to the new aesthetic of naturalness, clumps had to display both a variety of vegetation and forms according to the scenery in which they were placed.

The composition of clumps varied according to American treatise writers and observers. Bernard M’Mahon in 1806 was inclusive when he stated that clumps could be composed solely of trees or shrubs, or a mixture of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants. Ten years later, G. Gregory in his New and Complete Dictionary of Arts and Sciences (1816) suggested that clumps “of shrubs all of the same kind” created “good” effects. Clumps from a mixture of larger and smaller deciduous trees, such as the horse chestnut and red bud, were created at Monticello, as described by Thomas Jefferson (1807).

The arrangement of plant material within clumps was equally varied. An article in the 1833 volume of the New England Farmer recommended that “a proper system” be adopted in order to avoid “a heterogeneous mass, without meaning, without taste or design.” By contrast, American gardeners John Gardiner and David Hepburn, in the Am erican Gardener ( 1 8 04), recommended the use of a graduated slope for such plantings. Regarding the placement of this feature in the landscape, Whately distinguished between two modes. “Independent clumps,” considered “beautiful objects in themselves” could be used to “break an extent of lawn” or as a “continued line . . . of ground or of plantation.” “Relative clumps,” however, planted in relation to other garden features, could be used to create harmonies and contrasts, thus unifying the disparate parts of landscape garden into a single composition. Whately’s disparagement of artifice led him to regard independent clumps with suspicion because of their obvious artificiality. The best treatment of an independent clump, according to Whately, was the placement of “open” clumps (meaning that the plant material was well spaced) “at the point of an abrupt hill, or on a promontory into a lake or river,” where it served to focus the viewer’s attention. “Relative clumps” were more natural, according to Whately’s aesthetic, and a sensitive placement of them intensified the viewer’s visual experience of the garden by providing a succession of open and occluded views.

Thomas Jefferson, when writing in 1804 of his plan to create “advantageous catches of prospect” through the careful planting of clumps, was clearly familiar with Whately’s guidelines for “relative clumps.” This idea was especially apparent when Jefferson specified that he intended to break up his “canvas” of grove—“trimmed very high, so as to give it the appearance of open ground”—with “clumps of thicket, as the open grounds of the English are broken by clumps” of trees. Even in the 1830s when other garden styles, such as the gardenesque, were current, garden designers still envisioned clumps as a means to control access to a view, as in C. M. Hovey’s 1835 description in American Gardeners’ Magazine of Mansion House in Brookline, Mass. (see Gardenesque).

Several late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century American gardens exemplify the use of clumps according to Whately’s categories. Benjamin Henry Latrobe’s 1807 plan for the White House made use of planting features that corresponded to relative clumps, positioned to create a transition from the wood and garden [Fig. 2]. The notion that clumps could “relieve” the plainness of lawns or woods was found in C. M. Hovey’s description in the Magazine of Horticulture of Mrs. Pratt’s house in Boston (1850), which noted how clumps “broke” the monotony of the landscape. At Mount Auburn Cemetery in Cambridge, Mass., H.A.S. Dearborn (1831) praised how the clumps of trees and shrubs helped to diversify the “picturesque sheets of water.”

The aesthetic concerns of Whately and his contemporaries were complemented by the material advantages that clumps offered. As Charles Marshall wrote in 1799, clumps of four or five fenced-in forest trees provided an excellent resource for timber. Americans who cleared away trees for their homesteads presumably perceived the advantage of leaving standing clumps of trees for later use as construction or heating materials, as indicated in P. Campbell’s 1793 description of the Catskill Mountains.

Several treatise writers, however, condemned clumps. British designer Humphry Repton, while acknowledging that groups of trees were important elements in landscape design, argued that “formal” clumps of trees of equal height surrounded by a fence for their protection were ugly deformities because of their sameness. In one of his earliest writings (1836), American designer A. J. Downing declared the clump to be perfect. By the time he wrote his treatise (1849), he confessed that experience had taught him that the clump was the product of an amateur ornamental planting. He judged trees of the same height that were planted equidistant from one another in a circular form as overly artificial [Fig. 3]. Like Repton, Downing instead recommended arranging trees in irregular patterns in order to achieve “variety, connexion, and intricacy.”

-- Anne L. Helmreich

Texts

Usage

Citations

Images

Notes

Retrieved from "https://heald.nga.gov/mediawiki/index.php?title=Clump&oldid=16883"

History of Early American Landscape Design contributors, "Clump," History of Early American Landscape Design, , https://heald.nga.gov/mediawiki/index.php?title=Clump&oldid=16883 (accessed November 26, 2024).

A Project of the Center for Advanced Study in the Visual Arts

National Gallery of Art, Washington